Plus, it inflicts more damage beyond one‘s maximum range, wreak havoc, and retreat to minimum waste, to force the foes to retreat. The detonation of a photon torpedo warhead, enriched with fluoronetic vapor, powers a space-time continuum distortion emitter. As an added bonus for those using the mod Extra Ship Components NEXT, almost all weapons in this mod have two additional tiers if that mod is activated. Shahadem Jul 7, 2017 @ 5:14am. 装甲 （ Armor ）是舰船的直接减伤防护层，能够在结算伤害时先于船体值承受伤害，从而保护舰船。. None of their ship ever produce debris and their ship configuration is quite deadly. Penetrated by guided weapons, strike craft, and some exotic energy weapons (Disruptors, Arc Emitters, and Cloud Lightning). the regular ships already take months to recharge after passing through a pulsar, the offspring ships correspondingly longer, and the. 3. −5% accuracy. 100% penetration against shield; 150% damage against armor; 100% damage against hull; Additional multiplicative damage based on 100% of the target's ship. What's worse is whilst Autocannons and Missiles have similar damage stats, albeit the former enjoying greater range, Mass Drivers have less range and less damage than. That's a 1:1 ratio, which means (relatively speaking) defense. 1- They spawned really far and holy fuck so much micro. So the damage per second for each weapon is the same. A cutting beam is an ultra-high-energy directed laser weapon, powerful enough to slice away sections of a starship hull with great precision, but relatively ineffective against energy shields. I tried everything, strikecraft, artillery, energy weapons, etc. Large Auto is range 30 as well of course, but. Then you can dump however many millions of fleet power you have directly into whatever system the AI targets. . That's worse than 6+6=12s for a purely neutral weapon. . From what I remember shields only account for 20-25% of their total hp so focusing on shield destruction is folly. 50% shield hardening means 50% of the damage received goes to your hull or armor, 50% goes to the shield. The best wiki to get the latest updates and tips on the mobile game Stellaris: Galaxy Command!. I tried everything, strikecraft, artillery, energy weapons, etc. 0 (当前最新版本：3. 50, vs Gamma lasers at 6. I haven't played in almost a year. Only. The weapons the Unbidden use have 50% shield penetration. this gives you a lot more time to defeat the portal. And it's absolutely nonsense to use a lot of shield strength (cruiser. Is it that 50% of the damage goes to shields and 50% goes to armor/hull? If so, a little useless, since almost all ships have more hull than shields. I'm not a fan of this new type of ship parameter. In this video I explore the effe. 5 days. Jan 8, 2019. Turns out battleships with 5 Neutronium Armor and 1 Hyper shield with 6 (L) Marauder Missiles had the best results by a significant margin. They are called Space Torpedoes. With corvette spam, the tactic is to set up enclaves with defense platforms to attrit the opponent, fortresses to slow the enemy, and a battlewagon fleet that can start taking them on head-on. Missiles are a solid weapon thanks to having good accuracy, great range, ignoring shields, and no damage penalties. Consumes power. Empire of Sin AoW: Planetfall Cities: Skylines Crusader Kings 3 Europa Universalis 4 Hearts of Iron 4 Imperator: Rome Prison Architect Stellaris Surviving Mars Surviving the AftermathThe question is: how do penetration of shields differ from shield damage? How much I play - for some reason I did not notice the difference (maybe I looked badly). In late game battleships, you have a similar effect, just the other way around. And then I did the same test again, but this time without armor, no shield too. Sep 30, 2017 @ 3:43pm Ghost Signal So the machines have returned to purge the living. The bonuses are explicit for how/what they apply to. Well, as you know in Stellaris ships have 3 "health bars". The Stellaris 3. Because in vanila Stellaris all that Swarmer missiles have is 100% shield pen, so they don't bypass armor. Against other players in pvp, yes you would be right, as players usually don’t have +6000% bonuses to shield and armor or severe imbalances between shield/armor and hull (among other factors). is it ideal, who knows, is it perfect, i doubt it but it works for me. . 13. EDIT: If I get the Enigmatic Decoder from the Enigmatic. Plasma Torpedo 25% shield penetration; 35% armor penetration; 80% damage against shieldThe Unbidden use the highest tear generators and shield, but have no armor. this gives you a lot more time to defeat the portal. Contrary to some 'popular' opinion, they are mostly garbage. I have always wondered whats the point of having penetration. g, 100% penetration vs 75% hardening means 25% of the damage goes through. Deflector shield SHR-1 Deflector shiel. So what does that really mean? Does that mean it bypasses my shields and. For instance, this explosive has 100%. Third destroyer fleet lost 19 ships and the remaining hull was 38. Missiles have 100% shield penetration like fighters. Armor hardening is better and easier to get than shield hardening. Large. I think Stellaris could benefit from a breakdown of shield technology, allowing shields to become more specialised in the type of damage they absorb (similar to how EvE Online does this). Every so often, I'll need to focus on shields and use Shield Capacitors or Reactor Boosters, but mostly it's either Fire Control or Hull Tissue. Jun 15, 2019 @ 11:18pm "penetration" #1. It lacks the bonus to hull damage lasers have. Yes, but that doesn't matter too much. It's a great mode for Stellaris. 50% shield hardening means 50% of the damage received goes to your hull or armor, 50% goes to the shield. 1 (which is of course unrealistic): without any shield penetration you can't beat a ship using a decent recharge rate. 6 also includes new galaxy shapes to explore, new story events, a new. Missiles can be pretty strong now when you use the Advanced Ship Behaviour Mod, since then you can use the range advantage perfectly. It basically boils down to the armour penetration, shield penetration and hull effectiveness. Jun 15, 2019 @ 11:14pm Missiles 100% Shield Missiles do 100% to shield but i haven't seen any missile damage to shields in the last couple of single player games. Stellaris: Shield Hardeners - You must use them. So, does shield regenration happen daily or monthly? If it happens monthly, don't you think it should work on a daily bases?So im making custom tech for an assimilation empire (yeah its cliche but its the Borg) as an AI empire. Energy weapon or kinetic weapon. Latest Release: Strike Craft Diversity (Stellaris) This mod requires Amazing Space Battles for the graphics to work properly. 75% armor penetration 75% Shield penetration and 120 range as well as a high damage ratio. For instance, this explosive has 100% shield penetration, meaning it will do its full damage to armor and hull, so shields won't need to be taken. Destroying the Portal earns the Rift. Ironically, there is an advanced armor option known as Dragonscale Armor. You extinct anything before they get too close. Unfortunately by the time you research your own fighters most people have some PD, so carriers are better at defending against stuff like corvette swarms than on offense against a cruiser or up. avoid lasers, plasma or particle beams - their main strength (armor penetration) has 0 effect in this fight, leaving you with only their weakness (penalty vs. But yes, in absence of hardening penetration is very good, considering the armor and shield values are much higher than hull usually. your main fleet to engage fleets in system and newly arriving ones and the second smaller fleet on the side to engage with unbidden stations and hit the portal. So try to use focused arc emitters and cloud lightnings if you are going for a full penetration based ship design. Stellaris 50486 Bug Reports 30920 Suggestions 19157 Tech Support 2901 Multiplayer 377 User Mods 4632 Stellaris AAR (After Action Reports. Once you. 20 Range, 8 CD, 100% Shield Penetration, 66% Armor Penetration; Contingency uses Android Assault Army to invade worlds. Stellaris > General Discussions > Topic Details. It's pretty noticeable in a fight 1 vs. This component predominantly improves fire-rate as well as various performance, like evasion, tracking, accuracy, or weapons range, depending on behavior type. . Now say, 30% shield hardening cuts Disruptor damage by a third. • 2 yr. That’s 17. so if a titan for example, has enough components such that it has 100% shield hardening, does this mean the shields are equally effective against a weapon that has 0% shield penetration as it is against a weapon with 100% shield penetration like cloud. In terms of armor/shield balance, I find a 2:1 ratio works best. But next I found out "penetration shield 50%" and realized, that this is something wrong. 17 times the amount of shield power, then it is still worth it, even against bypass weapons. But it does miss, turning great early-game potential into a slow, dull grind. Penetration means it completely avoids the health bar and will directly damage the underlying bar. R5: In a war with a FE, they took a pulsar system on their border, space storm arrived. Granted, those are more GSG than 4X (especially CK2), but they are made by the same studio as Stellaris, which should count for something. Tell me :) And yes, the second question: Which weapons are maximally bypassing enemy shields (and DPS so. “虚空恶魔”应当是早期版本的误称。. some weapons are better at killing shields, some are better at killing armor and some are better at killing hull. Disruptors and other piercing weapons, since the Contingency has strong shields and armor but poor hull. shadowtheimpure. They DO have a tooltip that says that Archaeo-Engineer ascension perk adds 75 shield. . As a person who always roleplays as the defender of the galaxy in one way, my Unbidden playthroughs usually go in two ways. The only way to stop the Unbidden is to destroy the Extradimensional Portal. It'd be a considerable hard counter. We remove the armor/shield penetration mechanic all together (or if it is left in it is 20% maximum on very high end weapons). They are very good. 100% shield penetration. 100% Shield penetration = Ignores shields (no damage at all to shields). Yes, I'll attack the frigates yada yada. For instance, this explosive has 100% shield penetration, meaning it will do its full damage to armor and hull, so shields won't need to be taken down to. I do full penetration armaments for the titans and battleships. Sure it's great on it's own, but it pairs extremely poorly with any other weapon. R5: In a war with a FE, they took a pulsar system on their border, space storm arrived. Torpedo = 100% Shield penetration. Hello everybody. Corvettes with high evasion are really good too, and you should have those anyway. 25 days. Add like 10+ battleships to your fleet and rip the enemy apart? I heard that the Giga Canon was the way to go, but it looks like Focused Ar. -Kinetics have +(25-50%) shield penetration but-(50-75%) armor damage (armor is 50-75% more effective against kinetic)-Shields have -(50-75%) shield damage but ignore 50% of armor. That’s how badly hardening gimps penetration weapons. Yes, shields will regen and so will your armor/hull if you have the appropriate resources/tech/items. My fleet is getting totally destroyed, i have 29k and he has about 24K power rating, sorry if there's too much info but i guess, better safe than sorry. Frop. The question is: how do penetration of shields differ from shield damage? How much I play - for some reason I did not notice the difference (maybe I looked badly). Now say, 30% shield hardening cuts Disruptor damage by a third. From this we gained the knowledge on how to construct the most horrific of weapons: Focused Arc Emitters. More things penetrate shields, but if you're fighting something with only weapons that pierce armor and shields, armor hardening is probably better since armor has more HP. Weapons: As an added bonus for those using the mod Extra Ship Components NEXT, almost all weapons in this mod have two additional tiers if that mod is activated. • 1 yr. IPWIW. These are properties of Neutron Torpedoes/ Devastator Torpedoes/ Phase Disruptor Thanks!How to Use Cloaking in Stellaris. 1?. 6 patch notes, the latest Orion update brings a fleet combat rebalance and ascension path rework plus a new ascension path (requires Utopia). some weapons are better at killing shields, some are better at killing armor and some are better at killing hull. I've had trouble figuring this out exactly, but this is what it looks like. Fleet design is so huge in Stellaris itd be a massive shame to see it reduced, at the end of the day it is already a rock paper scissors where you find out if the enemy fleets are heavy on anti-armour or anti-shield, what range they engage, and what the armour/shield make. Stellaris. . Bolt. All of it is quite nice, but extreamally flat (tho, shields should not be fully. Hello everybody. Hello, As I understand, Hardening mathematically "reduces how much damage goes through by penetrating weapons". And so is born the fleet of the 170 torpvettes. Which also kinda makes sense. None of their ship ever produce debris and their ship configuration is quite deadly. The Ether Drake guards the planet known as Dragon’s Hoard and is one of the guardian creatures of Stellaris. LockdownA10 • 6 yr. 15% shield penetration; 25% armor penetration; Quantum torpedo warheads rely on rapid energy extraction from zero-point vacuum. If you want to disable enemy shields, the saturator X weapon is the best at that job. As I understand, Hardening mathematically "reduces how much damage goes through by penetrating weapons". Radiation Damage, 3x Moving AOE Cylinders 90' targeting arc to foes: _ Radiation Damage (3x/sec) and up to -75 All Damage Resistance Rating for 10 sec to self: -83. All Discussions. In-combat regeneration occurs but its not a significant factor. After some digging, I found this file: \Steam\steamapps\common\Stellaris\common\component_templates\weapon_components. At that point in time you can also invest in Armor or Shield Hardening, which is a lot more effective against penetration weapons. Hull, that once depleted, destroys ship. Sure it's great on it's own, but it pairs extremely poorly with any other weapon. g, 100% penetration vs 75% hardening means 25% of the damage goes through. Stellaris Galaxy Command Wiki. The damage is a variable between 1 and 221, but getting a full 221 damage to both armor and shielding is big. Xaphnir. So, does shield regenration happen daily or monthly? If it happens monthly, don't you think it should work on a daily bases?Does any one knows the difference? Some examples would be great. Medium. Jun 15, 2019 @ 11:14pm Missiles 100% Shield Missiles do 100% to shield but i haven't seen any missile damage to shields in the last couple of single player games. While this can be nice, it means that it isn't contributing to taking down the enemies shields, and so if you have one weapon with 100% shield penetration and other normal weapons the normal weapons will still. 1 (which is of course unrealistic): without any shield penetration you can't beat a ship using a decent recharge rate. Railguns with 30% bonus to shields and 50% armor penetration are perfect. If you mean by penetration resistance, then yes. But you should still be able to place a shield around the planet while the ring itself is also protected by a shield. 100% shield penetration. Neither Missiles, Autocannons nor Mass Drivers get special bonuses. Against something like. that this isn't a bad thing. 8) melt. Armor, that stand in a way to hull. In addition to the standard repeatables, Physics only has three repeatable techs to worry about. These are also stack. some weapons have armor/shield penetration so they ignore it. +100% Shield Penetration-25% Armour Damage +25% Hull Damage Tech Specialization Shield. Energy weapons generally have slightly better accuracy, lower damage and shorter range compared to kinetic weapons. Ideal for intercepting, escorting, and dogfighting. Time to bring out the torpedos. Callinicus. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. 15% shield penetration; 25% armor penetration; Quantum torpedo warheads rely on rapid energy extraction from zero-point vacuum. 27 dps. In addition to shield/armour bonus damage and penetration, consider the range and accuracy/tracking of the enemy weapons. Apart from point defense. . 30 per day/tick). 420K subscribers in the Stellaris community. And it's absolutely nonsense to use a lot of shield strength (cruiser, battleship) but don't use any shield capacitators at all. ago. And only 12. ParasiteX Apr 21, 2017 @ 9:12pm. IPWIW. For example strike craft and missiles will skip the shield HP and directly inflict dmg to armor -> hull. Plasma = 100% Armour penetration. Both are late game anyway so doesn't matter. It lacks the bonus to hull damage lasers have. 44 MB. Just don't expect much from Corvette shields. Trying to add shield graphic to the planets and activate by decisions or event but didn't find a best way. If any other. maybe some space fauna or raiders come and lower one, and the other one kills it. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. That is what the anomaly says. It gives +100% to both shield and armor penetration. Shield is better than hull in that it regenerates itself incredibly quickly ( not even regenerative hull is that good ), hull armor reduces dmg, and there is penetration for both, a 100% penetrative weapon vs shields means it either skips shields or does double dmg against them, against these weapons hull is the better choice. In addition to that, explosives tend to have Penetration. 45% shield penetration. Missiles are best now. There's no difference in Shield. 67. Added Armor Hardening and Shield Hardening modifiers, which reduce armor and shield penetration. Apart from this, Stellaris patch 3. Cheaper Alloys cost than armor. But it also penetrates armor by 50%. Damage redirected to the hardened component. 6 is now available on PC. If the Global Pacifier does function the way it does in Star Control 2, the beings inside survive just fine but are. Also, ditch anything bigger than a Corvette since the Contingency's weapons suck vs evasion. Stellaris. I could use a little help. csv Looks like they have potentially powerful shots but no tracking and they can take a while to fire. So if you got 2 shield hardener, and one armor hardener, then 50% damage will be taken by the shield, and 25% will be taken by the armor, and the remaining 25% will hit the hull. 9%. Micro-managing your citizens is one of the best aspects of planet administration in Stellaris – but it’s also one of the most complex and time-consuming. Ion-Cannon ( Small / Medium / Large ) - Anti-Shield energy weapon. All their ship are low hull/high armor/medium evasion craft (similar to vanilla Fallen Empire ships but without shield) but before you try to. 1). Hardening stacking question. The question is: how do penetration of shields differ from shield damage? How much I play - for some reason I did not notice the difference (maybe I looked badly). They're more effective the more shielding you have on the ship. Weapon damage per day and other properties of weapons, such as, shield and armor penetration, are factored in too. If you do have enough or think you do you ~can smack them hard with Torpedo corvette spam and always have your own PD. I thought that penetration just ignore corresponding defense (for example "penetration shield" ignores shield at all: it starts damaging armor at the very beginning, next damaging hull and next destroys enemy ship with completely untouched shield). reduction modifiers divide an amount of a resource or attribute by a set amount. I'd stack a crapload of them with torpedos and something that does shield penetration, I wouldn't even bring anything bigger. Lightning conduits have the 100% accuracy that makes them solid weapon options, Amoeba flagella are decent strikecraft and the 100% armor penetration from mining drone cutting lasers can be very useful when fighting off other space creatures in the early game since they don't. The Neutron Launcher mouse-over only shows "damage" stats and does not use the word "penetration. I’ll stack a range-aura juggernaut in with them. but with the new system it seems like you have to make huge sacrifices in weapon or support system quality to make a shield build work, while armor is essentially free. They sound like the obvious target for point defence, but point defence ignores them. Does any one knows the difference? Some examples would be great. 25 days. You don't really need anti-shield ships for Unbidden. Frop. Production Revolution. The differences between the weapons are much more nuanced. difference assuming 100% hit is only on the order of 6% less damage than a plasma/disruptor split with a balanced shield/armour target, difference being that there are 2 phases of battle, shields and armour/hull, and once the specialized weapon gets through. The question is: how do penetration of shields differ from shield damage? How much I play - for some reason I did not notice the difference (maybe I looked badly). So using them is a safe bet. In the past my way of doing things with fleet design was something along the lines of: use default fleets, staff fleet with ships of each class except corvett to about half of the fleet. 5. Missile Shield Penetration is mostly useful because in combination with Kinetic Artillery, every weapon largely focuses on the type of defense that it's good against. Penetration means it completely avoids the health bar and will directly damage the underlying bar. 当某个帝国掌握了 跃迁引擎 或 灵能跃迁引擎 后，异次元生物就可能发现本次元。. A cruiser, since they have high hulls, and use whatever segments needed to counter their frontline ships that are using the disruptors. it all depends on what you're going to be fighting. Hello everybody. After one of the fleets was halfway dead I stopped the test and recorded the damage to. Stellaris. Penetration means it completely avoids the healthbar and will directly damage the underlying bar. 13. 14 votes, 10 comments. They can outscale other weapons but you need to be deep into energy damage/attack speed repeatables. Hangar: One side strike craft, the other side are the highest level point-defense I have, or mixed if at the same level. so if you are already at 100% hardening, and you reduce hardening by 15%, but in return are able to get 0. Suppose a kinetic weapon does 1dps, targeting a ship with 6 shields and 6 armor. But next I found out "penetration shield 50%" and realized, that this is. You only need one of those debuff fleets because it affects all in-system enemies. In order for an entire fleet to be cloaked, every ship within the fleet must have this tech in its auxiliary slot. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is. kinetic, explosive), which would make for a more engaging system. Tell me :) And yes, the second question: Which weapons are maximally bypassing enemy shields (and DPS so. In Stellaris, if you lose the fight for the system, thats generally all that matter. Shield Penetration is stupid . The other version is "%chance to reduce any damage from penetrating at all" but I. Hello everybody. A battleship equipped with full enigmatic deflector shields and capacitors basically has infinitely regenerating armor. Threads of living metal react to incoming fire, rearranging itself to better resist penetrating. Second destroyer fleet lost 23 ships and the remaining hull was 44%. 6. 索林原虫（ ），又称“虫群”、“索林虫”、“普雷索林”，开发者代号为“swarm”，是《 的一种。. The weapons all appear to tend towards major penetration of a defensive layer, like shields or armor. As I understand, Hardening mathematically "reduces how much damage goes through by penetrating weapons". Turns out battleships with 5 Neutronium Armor and 1 Hyper shield with 6 (L) Marauder Missiles had the best results by a significant margin. ago. My fleet is getting totally destroyed, i have 29k and he has about 24K power rating, sorry if there's too much info but i guess, better safe than sorry. r/Stellaris • (Apparently) unpopular opinion: players discussing power balance, "optimal build", proposing nerfs and comparing empires based on power level are. [edit: the FE surrendered before I got to see what happens if I fight in that system] Even the shield capacitors are burnt out. I know this has been brought up before in the context of "I want to design my own starbase loadouts" but I'm suggesting something simpler that should be much easier to implement: if a starbase is built in a pulsar system (i. The Shroud. 09 0. All Discussions. They do about 50% less damage than a standard energy or kinetic weapon, but given that most (but not all ofc) endgame challenges have 1/3 or. changed effect for shielded worlds (added shieldworld mk 2 effect to the vanilla one) a second tech to get an improved version of the shield generator. That's physics. Say the weapon had 90% armor penetration (like Large Plasma or Tachyon Lance). This works because Amoebas are carriers, they flay you with fighters. a fleet designed to fight the unbidden will be vastly different than a fleet designed to fight the prethoryn scourge. and it feels like such an all or nothing type of weapon build that any weapon that doesn't have full armor/shield penetration is a waste. enemy leans much more torwards battle ships and. To top it off, the time loop had become destabilized over an extremely long time. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Ideal for intercepting, escorting, and dogfighting. 75 sec (+100% shield penetration, +100% armor penetration) Bombers carry large payloads of heavy disruptors to devastate both capital ships and strike craft. (Except for the shield debuff). Tell me :) And yes, the second question: Which weapons are maximally bypassing enemy shields (and DPS so. 75 sec (+100% shield penetration, +100% armor penetration) Bombers carry large payloads of heavy disruptors to devastate both capital ships and strike craft. Neither Missiles, Autocannons nor Mass Drivers get special bonuses. shield nullification), it substitutes armor for shields and doesn't use shield-specific weaponry. I have seen in other posts better configurations but for some reason I do not have slots to place other types of weapons, like the G for example, this is the best thing that occurred to me. Railguns with 30% bonus to shields and 50% armor penetration are perfect. According to the official Stellaris 3. 5 multiplier. Advanced shields require Strategic Resource to make. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. Shield hardeners are a new defensive technology in the upcoming 3. Torpedo = 100% Shield penetration. 34. The Vazuran menace is from More Events mod, they are designed to be a constant bother to you until you finish them off. It then gets divided by 4, presumably to make it the type of number Paradox. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. Nov 16, 2023I thought that penetration just ignore corresponding defense (for example "penetration shield" ignores shield at all: it starts damaging armor at the very. Hello everybody. This article is for the PC version of Stellaris only. [deleted] • 5 yr. The weapons all appear to tend towards major penetration of a defensive layer, like shields or armor. This is represented in Stellaris by 'penetration'. 80% damage pierce. Plus mining habitats around every planet with gas, motes or crystals. Disruptors are mostly for the memes or countering certian crises. The most powerful defense is a strong gateway network, with all your ready fleets stationed orbiting a gateway in your staging system. Unfortunately battleships can't equip torpedoes or you'd be perfect. 30 sec (+25% shield bonus, +25% hull bonus) - 425 speed So if weapon have damage 8-14 with 100% armor penetration, that mean, weapon damage is actual 8. Shield Penetration 50 50 50 50 50 Build Time 90 180 360 600 960 Usage/Round 0. If the enemy has no shield penetration, then shield hardening does nothing.